Psychological Contract Fulfillment and Employee Workplace Commitment
Keywords:
Psychological Contract, Contract Fulfillment, Organizational CommitmentAbstract
Psychological contract fulfillment has become an important concept for understanding the quality of the employment relationship and its influence on employee attitudes and behavior. A psychological contract refers to employees' perceptions concerning the reciprocal obligations between themselves and their organization. When employees believe that organizational promises and obligations have been fulfilled, they may develop stronger trust, positive work attitudes, and attachment to the organization. In contrast, perceived failures to meet organizational obligations can weaken employees' confidence in the employment relationship and negatively affect their organizational attitudes. Previous research has connected psychological contract experiences with organizational commitment, job satisfaction, trust, organizational citizenship behavior, and employee well-being. This article examines the conceptual relationship between psychological contract fulfillment and employee workplace commitment. It discusses the meaning and dimensions of psychological contracts, mechanisms through which fulfillment may influence commitment, the role of trust and organizational support, and implications for managers. The article concludes that transparent communication, fair treatment, career opportunities, recognition, and consistency between organizational promises and actual practices can contribute to a stronger employment relationship.
References
Conway, N., Guest, D., & Trenberth, L. (2011). Testing the differential effects of changes in psychological contract breach and fulfillment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.01.003
Guest, D. E. (2004). The psychology of the employment relationship: An analysis based on the psychological contract. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 541–555.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9707180265
Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574–599.
Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137–152.
Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(3), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160309
Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139.
Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 389–400.
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage.
Rousseau, D. M., & McLean Parks, J. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 1–43.
Zhao, H. A., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647–680.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zafar-Uz-Zaman Anjum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
